Software Expertise vs. Technical Subject Knowledge
Hi all,
If you are the responsible guy for absorbing people in for your company, on what basis you select them? Let's say, in case of a draftsman, do you prefer his knowledge in the CAD softwares to his technical subject knowlege (Like Electrical, Civil, Mechanical) etc.? I have seen so many people being absorbed into companies without knowing the ABCs of computer aided drafting. Moreover whenever you attend an interview as a CAD draftsman, most often you are supposed to design and draft something as per the interviewer's suggestion (May be for the first and last time) and the skills you have aquired in drafting is of little use if you are not well aware of the subject. So what is the future of CAD addicts who spend a lot of time in enriching their own CAD skills...? Are they simply wasting time...?
Thanks
har!s
RE: Software Expertise vs. Technical Subject Knowledge
To be a draughtsman, as opposed to a tracer or operator, implies subject knowledge - doesn't it?
RE: Software Expertise vs. Technical Subject Knowledge
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaberwok
To be a draughtsman, as opposed to a tracer or operator, implies subject knowledge - doesn't it?
Ofcourse, subject knowledge is required. But considering the amount of time we spend expanding the software knowledge, as opposed to the subject knowledge, it seems less worthy as per the situation mentioned above. Shouldn't we spend more time on expanding the subject knowledge rather than spending it on the software knowledge? (By the way, I personally don't like to spend more time on subject related things. My interest lies in the software arena)
har!s
RE: Software Expertise vs. Technical Subject Knowledge
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoomharis
Let's say, in case of a draftsman, do you prefer his knowledge in the CAD softwares to his technical subject knowlege (Like Electrical, Civil, Mechanical) etc.? So what is the future of CAD addicts who spend a lot of time in enriching their own CAD skills...? Are they simply wasting time...?
There was a time where being a "CAD addict" was enough, then over time it became obvious there were too many "CAD addicts" without technical skills. So principles began to look for technical people and then teach them the "CAD Skills". For the future, its important to realize that the software will be more and more usable and the employees entering the workforce will be more likely to have skills in the associated software. As a result, the people with the most technical knowledge will be the most in demand, especially once many firms slim down a bit due to the production benefits of software and data interoperability.
You are not wasting your time to enrich your CAD skills! It's very important to be productive and if you are more productive than the next guy then your worth is that much more for the company. But, its very likely that you are not focusing on the most important area if you don't already have a grasp on your field of choice.
Myself, I am a "CAD addict" and a few months ago I took a job training, teaching CAD. Yet I hope it leads to a more extensive career in teaching; an inside track to the emerging field of using technology in project management; expertise in using technology for property management. So now I'm learning the technology and about a year from now (once I've gotten the technology semi-mastered) I plan on studying/gaining experience in the business management end of things. Personally I'm not sure where that takes my career (I know I'll be in this industry for a good length of time) but when they day comes to move on I'll have a wide range of experience both professionally and technically... which is ultimately important. So it IS important to have good CAD skills, but its more important to understand your industry so you can utilize those skills and that you are fine-tuning your skills for that future.
RE: Software Expertise vs. Technical Subject Knowledge
I think this subject runs parallel to the subject of IT in schools. For a few years it was thought important that all school leavers had programming ability - or, at least, programming knowledge. After this period it was realised (I think) that most school leavers didn't need this at all. All they really needed was to be able to use Word, Excel, Access, etc.. That is, the pc is just another tool like a pen or a reference library.
That's not very well put, I know. :-(
RE: Software Expertise vs. Technical Subject Knowledge
I think redWORKX makes a really good point on this subject and I agree with him. Though the use of CAD is important, it is more important to have knowledge of the subject matter. If you had two people, one with good working knowledge of CAD, but no practical knowledge of the subject matter. Then you have another guy who is a novice CAD user but has good knowledge of the subject matter, which would you choose.
Me, I would take the second guy. It has been my experience that it is easier to teach some one CAD then to teach them the nuances of drafting in my Field of work. The subject matter is more complicated and sometimes harder to teach. Using the program is more straight forward and easier to teach. This has been my experience.
RE: Software Expertise vs. Technical Subject Knowledge
I think it depends on the field and the software. Speaking as someone who was job looking six months ago, the interviewers all wanted to know about my CAD expertise. As they were looking for draftsmen, they were more concerned about my knowledge of the software and all offered on-the-job training for the specifics of the field. That being said, seeing as I am more comfortable in the MEP field (mechanical, electrical, plumbing) when I came upon a place looking for civil drafters, I respectfully declined. (Ok, so the pay would have stunk, too, but still...)
Should a company be looking, however, for a designer then the knowledge of the software may not be as important to them, but it would certainly be a bonus.
RE: Software Expertise vs. Technical Subject Knowledge
An Architectural Degree takes min. 7years in the UK, A CAD course can take about a week (sometimes longer). And with both you only become profficient by actually using your technical or software knowledge in the real world, i.e. outside of a classroom..
I think its easier to teach a person how to use a piece of software than it is to train them in there relevant field.
I'm also a CADaholic, but whilst I thrive on learning extra tips tricks in CAD, the technical side has to come first.
As an example I will give somebody in my office a project to work on, which will often be in the form hand drawn sketches (I design almost everything by hand first). A CAD drafter will generally simply digitise the original sketches and thats it, where as somebody with a bit of technical knowledge will likely put more thought into the building rather than what layers things are on - I think I'd take the guy who puts more thought into the building design itself every time.
just my 2p
RE: Software Expertise vs. Technical Subject Knowledge
We always go with Technical over Cad knowledge.
I can teach the software fairly quickly, It's hard to teach the trade to someone who has never worked in it.