The company i work for has just phased out 2004/2005 autodesk products. We currently have 2007 to 2010 implemented (including autocad, raster, map, civil3d, revit, ldd, etc.)
We have been running into more than the usual bugs, performance, and install/deployment issues with all our current versions. some issues get resolved while others have not been encountered by others in the forums and subscription help can't replicate the issues.
Our IT department says that we should only have one version installed on our machine and that is the reason for all our problems. I'm not convinced that they are right as i get the feeling they are just completely frustrated with all the problems.
Because of project constraints, many of us are still dependent on multiple versions to meet client needs.
I'd like to hear other people's thoughts on running multiple versions on the same machine.