Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Transaction failure inside a transaction?

  1. #1
    Active Member
    Join Date
    2008-02
    Posts
    58
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Transaction failure inside a transaction?

    I'm getting the standard "attempted to modify an object outside a transaction" however all modifications are done inside a transaction. From the error I suspect it may be that it's because I'm attempting to modify a component that is hosted inside another object and the scope of the transaction only include the component not the host object.

    Can anyone confirm or deny this?

  2. #2
    All AUGI, all the time
    Join Date
    2006-08
    Posts
    636
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Transaction failure inside a transaction?

    Jeremy's blog has this issue covered in depth, perhaps you can do some search there, the building coder?

  3. #3
    Active Member
    Join Date
    2008-02
    Posts
    58
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Transaction failure inside a transaction?

    Ok, I changed the transaction mode from manual to automatic and it works, if I find out why it was failing at the Building Coder I'll post it here.

  4. #4
    I could stop if I wanted to
    Join Date
    2007-12
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    236
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Transaction failure inside a transaction?

    Quote Originally Posted by abe.buckingham View Post
    Ok, I changed the transaction mode from manual to automatic and it works, if I find out why it was failing at the Building Coder I'll post it here.
    Just be aware that your code will be outdated in future releases as they are stopping the automatic feature.

  5. #5
    Active Member
    Join Date
    2005-09
    Posts
    69
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Transaction failure inside a transaction?

    Quote Originally Posted by sgermano View Post
    Just be aware that your code will be outdated in future releases as they are stopping the automatic feature.
    I dont think so - I think its the automatic regeneration that is going to be stopped

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2012-05-01, 11:41 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2012-04-25, 08:12 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2010-10-08, 10:02 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2007-04-27, 02:08 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2006-10-12, 03:44 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •