Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Standard for US drawings title block - binding strip dimension

  1. #1
    Super Moderator david_peterson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Madison, WI

    Default Standard for US drawings title block - binding strip dimension

    The title kind of says it all.
    I'm in the process of updating our title blocks to give them a slightly larger binding strip due to complaints from PAs and PMs that on half size sets the binding strip covers up some of the drawing area.
    Currently we use a standard of 1 1/2" for the binding strip.
    Is there any industry standard for dimension of the binding strip that we should be using?

    I looked at a piece of standard binding and where the creases are it would appear to be 1" of cover. So I think I'm going to use 2" so at half size, I still have an inch.
    Any advice would be helpful.
    Dave Peterson
    BIM Coordinator

    Acad - 2016 - Revit 2018 w/ A360 - Navisworks - 3ds 2018 - Ensacpe - Lumion - Win 7 64 - i7-6700K 4.0GHz 32GB DDR4 Ram - Nvidia Quadro K2200
    "The more you know, the less you know, because the more you know you don't know". --M. Lin

  2. #2
    Certifiable AUGI Addict cadtag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Cairo - no, not Illinois

    Default Re: Standard for US drawings title block - binding strip dimension

    the commercial pre-printed binding strips we buy are 3 in wide total (11" length for binding AnsiB 11x17 sets) between the creases is 3/8", so depending on the number of sheets being bound, the covered up edge could be anywhere from 1.5" to under an inch.
    Real pirates wear silk suits & ties, and write EULAs
    The only thing more dangerous to the liberty of a free people than big government, is big business.

    Toward a Sustainable Water Future: Visions for 2050

  3. #3
    AUGI Addict
    Join Date

    Default Re: Standard for US drawings title block - binding strip dimension

    We get around that through some dimensional discrepancies. Our drawings are A1, when printing reduced size it goes onto an 11x17 which is slightly wider/shorter in aspect ratio. By printing upside down it provides more than sufficient distance for binding without buggering about with plot offsets or building in extra space between the trim and drawing border.
    If you are going to fly by the seat of your pants, expect friction burns.
    Some say beauty is in the eye of the Beholder... perhaps so, but I've only seen the disintegration beam.
    Everyone else being wrong is not the same thing as being right.

  4. #4
    ACA Community Director dkoch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Fluffya, PA

    Default Re: Standard for US drawings title block - binding strip dimension

    We have a 1.5" allowance for binding on full-size prints and do not do anything special for half-size. My set typically was unbound and held together with clips so that revised sheets can be swapped in and void sheets "retired" to a separate void set, so I guess I really never worried much about how the binding worked on half-size sets.
    David Koch

Similar Threads

  1. 2013: Title Block form for Multi-Page Drawings
    By d.m.polsky in forum Inventor - General
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2014-11-06, 01:20 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2013-01-18, 04:41 PM
  3. Title block note for record drawings when using outside contractor
    By teresa.b.fontaine in forum CAD Management - General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2009-07-30, 06:00 PM
  4. Difficulties Binding Drawings
    By rfitzpatrick in forum AutoCAD General
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 2008-07-03, 05:51 PM
  5. Convert MDT Title Block to Inventor 10 Title Block
    By julesgordon in forum Inventor - General
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2005-07-18, 08:34 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts