hi Bill,
I tried
to provoke the reaction of the defenders of ACA but only Neje answered. I think he's the only one in the world smart enough to use it (as ACA requires very high tecnological capacity, near to aerospatial engineers), but somehow he still hasn't discovered any other simpler and more powerful tools. I also wonder how does he deal with all those dysfunctional tools like 2D auto-sections or similar fakes. As he says, it's better not to use the Project Navigator, a core ACA tool. I know, it involves a bewildering complexity. Hopefully you can concentrate all the work of the Style Manager in one single team member's hands. You won't never waste a small part of that time in no one else. Only if that team member leaves. Maybe its better to do it yourself so that you will prevent a critical dependency for the basic control of your projects.
I have a question for you: do you have to pay for using ACA? can you buy it alone or it comes free with Autocad?
Anyway, don't waste your time in ACA, go to Revit or Sketchup. It's even better staying in Autocad.
Good luck if you decide to try it!!