Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Dynamic Blocks: Shared Apps Recognizing Anonymous Only

  1. #1
    I could stop if I wanted to CEHill's Avatar
    Join Date
    2006-05
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    327
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Dynamic Blocks: Shared Apps Recognizing Anonymous Only

    Let me preface this message by saying that you will not see many here that are more enthusiastic about the use and potential time-savings inherent with dynamic blocks.

    HISTORY
    For quite some time (since a final project went belly-up over this topic when creating a programmed block insert redefinition routine during an otherwise excellent, online and live class in VB.NET for AutoCAD), the anonymous name - assigned whenever there is a change to the default state of the dynamic block - has been the bane of my AutoCAD block-using existence.

    EXPORTING THE REAL NAME
    Other apps appear only to (Bluebeam eXtreme, etc.) recognize the anonymous name when the dynamic block's effective name I desired at all times.

    SUGGESTIONS FOR EFFECTIVE RELIEF
    Can someone provide some relief; taking the pain out of what is an ever-present 'bane': those ubiquitous and annoying anonymous block names?

    I feel that there is a solution.

  2. #2
    I could stop if I wanted to
    Join Date
    2012-11
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    239
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Dynamic Blocks: Shared Apps Recognizing Anonymous Only

    I agree it is a pain.
    The way I work around this is selecting by layer name and then using unique layer names for each dynamic block.
    It is not ideal but I find it to be compatible with both VBA and Lisp.
    I hope this helps.

  3. #3
    I could stop if I wanted to CEHill's Avatar
    Join Date
    2006-05
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    327
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Dynamic Blocks: Shared Apps Recognizing Anonymous Only

    Wow, this effort is a big sacrifice on your part! As I am attempting to enforce layer naming structure here, the unique block name as a layer name is currently not the best option.

    Due to this one big SNAFU in the creation of this otherwise stellar functionality, the potential advantages of dynamic blocks are really diminished in my eyes:

    I intensely dislike these anonymous names!

  4. #4
    Administrator Opie's Avatar
    Join Date
    2002-01
    Location
    jUSt Here (a lot)
    Posts
    9,106
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Dynamic Blocks: Shared Apps Recognizing Anonymous Only

    The block's Effective Name is provided in the insert reference to the block definition. Unfortunately, one cannot provide a selection filter for this effective name.

    You might suggest to Autodesk to improve their printer driver for PDF creation to include the desired output. That's what I am understanding your problem to be. However, if it is a third party print driver, you would need to contact the third party to explore a solution.
    If you have a technical question, please find the appropriate forum and ask it there.
    You will get a quicker response from your fellow AUGI members than if you sent it to me via a PM or email.
    jUSt

Similar Threads

  1. Impression not recognizing CAD layers in blocks?
    By jon.200969 in forum Impression - General
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2010-08-11, 05:55 PM
  2. Dynamic blocks become anonymous
    By kathy71046 in forum Dynamic Blocks - Technical
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2008-06-12, 07:02 AM
  3. Anonymous Blocks
    By bweir in forum Dot Net API
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2007-11-01, 02:05 PM
  4. Anonymous Blocks
    By autocad.wishlist1734 in forum AutoCAD Wish List
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 2006-06-12, 06:59 PM
  5. Anonymous Blocks
    By seppanen.75334 in forum AutoCAD General
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 2005-01-27, 08:40 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •