Aaron,
Yeah, but had they paid 133 million for them? That's a big write off.I wouldn't put anything past Adsk. I know several developers there. The company has killed some very good products before
ADT is good for resellers. They have an API, it's a pig to use so people need lots of training, etc. The big problem IMO is the reseller model of selling/supporting is wrong for Revit. You need companies/personal who understand architecture/ 3D design, the effect Revit has on your 'process' and who are proactively researching the role of BIM for their local markets. These people need higher level access to development than they get currently through the reseller system and they should be making more margin because of it.ADT is "selling" well. We all know that everyone is really using Acad
When Autodesk showed Revit to all their resellers those that said 'this is the future' should have got exclusive reseller rights. How Solidworks/ ArchiCAD is sold is a much better way for software like Revit. Inventor 'sold' more seats last year than Solidworks but Solidworks made considerably more profit on those slightly lower sales. What doesn that tell you?
Doesn't really make sense does it? .Net is primarily about web services and it only runs on windows unless you use Mono etc. The C# language isn't as fast as compiled code. If it's 5 times faster it's not because it runs on .Net (assuming my understanding of .Net is correct). I really hope Revit doesn't go down the .Net route.Some of the discreet guys re-wrote the whole code from scratch on their own time - I heard - using .Net and it is 5x faster. They render on networked Sony Playstations!
I reckon Autodesk aren't going to get really serious about pushing Revit until there is MEP and some sort of API. Until the large firms using ADT for these tasks have a migration path they're not going to move. Remember Autodesk purchased Revit for the push into large firms.Revit has a small user base. We all know it is better, but Carol doesn't care about that. Just sales numbers.
How would you feel if your boss went out and purchased another architects design because your work wasn't good enough? You'd have to imagine there's a fair bit of internal friction between the Autodesk/Revit development teams at the moment.The ADT developers hate Revit. They say "the code isn't clean, they have a bad object model." However, ADT is buggy sh*t. Revit just plain works.
Looking at ADT, Arch. Studio, DWF you'd have to wonder if Autodesk have a cultural problem developing user friendly programs inhouse.Excluding Revit, perhaps they're destined to always be a purchaser of innovation rather than a developer of innovation? Watch out Sketchup....
ADSK is a classic "bad" American company. They suck, but the stock price looks good.You can't change the past, and the architectural professions lack of interest in Revit when it was Revit speaks volumes. Look how many people are only using Revit now because it's sold by Autodesk.I for one, wish Revit had gone it alone....
I'd still like to know why Dassault didn't want to support them more, particularly given their deal with Gehry Technologies and the obvious synergies with Solidworks/CATIA.
Mind you, with Revit's approach to marketing at the time some of us wondered if it wasn't always Revit's plan to be purchased by Autodesk....
Guy