just testing how revit works in interior.purely modelled and rendered in revit.
|
|
|
just testing how revit works in interior.purely modelled and rendered in revit.
Last edited by npv_89; 2006-10-27 at 05:01 AM.
I would get rid of those people as a start.
snurresprett9 ..It would be more helpful if you gave your reasons for this kind of remarkOriginally Posted by snurresprett9
and add your suggestions for improvement.
The kind of remarks you make reflects more badly on yourself & says more about you than the actual work presented.
I also think people would take your comments more seriously if you presented your own high quality work.
Hey there,
I really like the background skyline! Very nice touch.
Keep it up
Steve
It looks good for your first interior rendering, and for the saturated type of a rendering...
I would think about removing the woman, who detracts from the image, or at least in the first rendering "mirror" her, so she is kinda looking at the boy...and she should be either rotated in the second or removed...
The city background is quite nice indeed...
Originally Posted by luigi
Steven, Roger & Luigi,
Thanks for your constructive comments. i'll remember that and i am learning from your comments.I am still on the process of learning revit. Hoping that i can learn more. The background was Singapore skyline bynight.
More power to you guys and thank you very much.
Last edited by npv_89; 2006-10-27 at 03:11 PM.
Looks good, and again the background is a nice touch.Originally Posted by npv_89
What do you intend to use rendered images for eg. presenting to Clients or Local Authorities etc.
I haven't delved into visualisations too much (oh but if I had the time) but it seems that with Revit and Accurender you can get some nice result without turning it into a lifes work.
Hi snurresprett9 (sorry I don't know your name),Originally Posted by snurresprett9
I've seen a few of replies to people who have posted their work on these forums and the type of reply you often give is akin to that above. I'm sure your not intending to be offensive or rude but unfortunately that is how it comes across. As Roger has already mentioned above your reply in its current form isn't very constructive and will likely be ignored, if you perhaps expanded on your comment by saying something like "the figures distract from the scene", or whatever your thoughts are on why the figures should be removed, then it would be more helpful to the original poster who is basically looking for some feedback and advice. One of the many reasons AUGI exists.
I just did; lose the persons, they look out of place and doesnt cast any shadows. It's better to leave out things that looks that unnatural.Originally Posted by Roger Evans
I guess I'm used too other web-forums like Pushpullbar2, where people can take critisism.
My quality work? He he... I've never claimed to do any quality renderings. Here's something I did. Tear my head off please!Originally Posted by Roger Evans
Good Work especially for First Interior
My comments are
Part of the limitations of Accurender but I think but the carpet looks like its floating & too square Carpet would be improved with a border around it & the floor finish is not enticing ~ are you trying to reproduce an existing environment ?
Colour contrast of curtains & drapes ~ seems a liitle bland
Bed seems too high (unless its meant to be)
Love the backdrop image
I can see a lot of work & effort has gone into this so well done & keep going
Last edited by Roger Evans; 2006-10-27 at 06:59 PM.
Good bit of work there what programs did you use?Originally Posted by snurresprett9
I especially like the floor reflections & feel of softness in the image