what files are referencing?

[Wanderer]

Hi

Have you tried to run it in AutoCAD 2005?

Only ask as the routine will successfully run in AutoCAD 2002 (I just tested here).

Have a good one, Mike

No, I didn't run it yet. I am not sure where to start to select the probable files.
I wonder how long this thing takes to run with a lot of files, and I wonder if it will search down through many levels of folders or just search drawings I select? argh!

Basic point here is LOUSY DOCS from the contractor! Even if I do find the titleblock, the info I need isn't in the base drawing, I wonder if it will be tacked on in the file referencing it???

~sob~ I need a vacation.

[Mike.Perry]

Hi

Give the Help file (which is very good) that comes with it a read, will probably answer a lot of your questions about what the routine can_do/can't_do.

Have a good one, Mike

[Ed Jobe]

I certainly hope that's not a subtle jab at the way I've created my filing system, is it?
Or, are you saying that you think I should purchase a doc mgmt system of some sort?

I started here 4 years ago with no experience.
I walked into the file room, and asked 'so, who can explain the filing system to me?'
Everyone immediately fell on the floor laughing.
It has certainly been a great learning experience. I've created a detailed database of our 150,000 hard copy prints, and some 60 or 70,000 CAD files. But, there are a couple hundred of each whose origin/identity/whatnot cannot be determined.

Thanks for the tip Mike P, I'll check it out.

No, there was nothing in there that referred to your past/present practices. Just that is a built-in feature of all the dms that I have researched. A routine may help to figure out those few cases, but with that many dwgs, you need something that handles this on a regular and reliable basis. With that many dwgs, you surely have ample justification for a dms. The fact that you felt compelled to write a db would argue in favor of that. However, you could add that feature to your datbase. You probably have a single table with a record for each dwg/doc. Each should have a unique ID. If the table doesn't have one, add an ID field. Then create another table that will have a one-many relationship. Write a macro that gets the name and path of any xrefs in each dwg and populate the table with this info. Then you can simply do a query to find parents or children of a dwg. You may have to make sure that all xrefs are in your db, not just the parents. But as I said, this is how my current dms does it. A click of a button in its GUI gives you this info.

[Wanderer]

No, there was nothing in there that referred to your past/present practices. Just that is a built-in feature of all the dms that I have researched. A routine may help to figure out those few cases, but with that many dwgs, you need something that handles this on a regular and reliable basis. With that many dwgs, you surely have ample justification for a dms. The fact that you felt compelled to write a db would argue in favor of that. However, you could add that feature to your datbase. You probably have a single table with a record for each dwg/doc. Each should have a unique ID. If the table doesn't have one, add an ID field. Then create another table that will have a one-many relationship. Write a macro that gets the name and path of any xrefs in each dwg and populate the table with this info. Then you can simply do a query to find parents or children of a dwg. You may have to make sure that all xrefs are in your db, not just the parents. But as I said, this is how my current dms does it. A click of a button in its GUI gives you this info.

I am not too hip on doc mgmt systems, so I wasn't sure. ;p

I have a hard time justifying anything to this crowd, though. Bunch of doctors and such don't even want to Pony up for a workstation better than what they give my secretary.
I don't have a unique field in my dbase, but, of course, it would be simple to write one.
Macro, huh? I haven' written one of those in a couple of years.
Luckily I am familiar enough with our complex and our contractors that I don't have this type of 'mystery file' pop up very often.

I wasn't away that that type of things could be done, but, I feel a little more knowlegable now.

Thanks for the info. :cheers:

[Ed Jobe]

For the crowd that only thinks in terms of dollars going out the window, it shouldn't be too hard to show them what dollars are currently going out the window by not using a dms. Check out this white paper in the sidebar of this page.

If you decide to go the roll-your-own route, just holler.

[mjfarrell]

If you decide to go the roll-your-own route, just holler.

Hello, Willie Nelson, or would this be handled by Snoop Dogg?

[BrenBren]

Hello, Willie Nelson, or would this be handled by Snoop Dogg?

If it were Snoop it would be

holla fo schizo and pass the chronic

[Ed Jobe]

Maybe the ZigZag man? I know nuthin' bout rap. (purposely)

[Wanderer]

Hello, Willie Nelson, or would this be handled by Snoop Dogg?

Willie Nelson, thank you.

Almost got strung up when I was being interviewed for jury duty on a possession case. I said I think they should make it legal, but make alcohol illegal. just my opinion. I've never been injured by someone driving... after rolling their own.

Anywho eljobe, I might like to try doing this on my own. I don't know, I still have to start learning this whole MAP dbase stuff, so ~shrug~ one day at a time.