Donnerstag, September 2, 2010
Homepage   |   Suchen   |   Über AUGIde   |   Mein AUGI   |   Jetzt registrieren

Go Back   AUGI Forums > AUGI Technical (English) > AEC > Revit > Revit Architecture Support > Revit Architecture - General
 Welcome, Guest. 

Login

Join Now FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Revit Architecture - General Main discussion area for the latest release of Revit Architecture.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2009-04-28, 01:25 PM   #1
greg_gebert
100 Club
 
greg_gebert's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2007-09
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 188
greg_gebert appears to be going the right way
Default 2009 vs. 2010

Does anyone know where I can find a document that explains what was changed between 2009 and 2010? I hope it wasn't just the interface?
__________________
Greg Gebert

Dell Precision T3400
Windows XP x64
Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.4GHz
8GB Ram
NVIDIA Quadro FX1700 (512MB)
greg_gebert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-04-28, 01:31 PM   #2
clog boy
All AUGI, all the time
 
clog boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2006-12
Location: Probably near a PC.
Posts: 791
clog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moon
Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by greg_gebert View Post
Does anyone know where I can find a document that explains what was changed between 2009 and 2010? I hope it wasn't just the interface?
This page features known issues and feature summaries. Courtesy Revit.com (Autodesk's shortcut to their revit page)
__________________
The Internet: slowly destroying intellect, one “zomg first!!!111!!1!” at a time.

- Storblington
clog boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-04-28, 01:41 PM   #3
dpasa
All AUGI, all the time
 
dpasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2004-08
Location: Greece
Posts: 629
dpasa has a bright futuredpasa has a bright futuredpasa has a bright futuredpasa has a bright futuredpasa has a bright futuredpasa has a bright future
Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

Mainly it was the interface and the new curtain wall panels.... Some small nice features but nothing much... and of course, nothing from the users wishlist.
__________________
D.P.A.S.A. I prefer Revit not for what it is, but for what it can be one day...
dpasa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-04-28, 01:42 PM   #4
greg_gebert
100 Club
 
greg_gebert's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2007-09
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 188
greg_gebert appears to be going the right way
Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by dpasa View Post
Mainly it was the interface and the new curtain wall panels.... Some small nice features but nothing much... and of course, nothing from the users wishlist.
PERFECT! Thanks.
__________________
Greg Gebert

Dell Precision T3400
Windows XP x64
Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.4GHz
8GB Ram
NVIDIA Quadro FX1700 (512MB)
greg_gebert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-04-28, 01:44 PM   #5
ntnik
I could stop if I wanted to
 
Join Date: 2006-04
Posts: 400
ntnik appears to be going the right way
Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

i was reading a few posts over the last few days.....have seen a few where 2010 seems to strike users as problematic ( is it big deal or should we just jump on in?).....we're a little slow here advancing to the more recent release.....concerning that issue (our slowness) i may be on the verge of creating a mistake, so i ask.....i havet a big project we executed in 2008....i have kept it there and seem to need to continuously update it as a result of changes, requests for supplemental details, etc. Do i need to go ahead and at least updat it to 2009?......or, am i ok keeping it in 2008?
ntnik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-04-28, 02:17 PM   #6
Andrew Dobson
I could stop if I wanted to
 
Join Date: 2004-10
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 378
Andrew Dobson is glowing brightlyAndrew Dobson is glowing brightlyAndrew Dobson is glowing brightlyAndrew Dobson is glowing brightlyAndrew Dobson is glowing brightlyAndrew Dobson is glowing brightlyAndrew Dobson is glowing brightlyAndrew Dobson is glowing brightlyAndrew Dobson is glowing brightlyAndrew Dobson is glowing brightlyAndrew Dobson is glowing brightly
Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

There is no technical problem keeping it on 2008. There may be licensing issues if you are not on subscription that you may have to clarify with your reseller.
Andrew Dobson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-04-28, 02:48 PM   #7
greg_gebert
100 Club
 
greg_gebert's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2007-09
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 188
greg_gebert appears to be going the right way
Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by ntnik View Post
i was reading a few posts over the last few days.....have seen a few where 2010 seems to strike users as problematic ( is it big deal or should we just jump on in?).....we're a little slow here advancing to the more recent release.....concerning that issue (our slowness) i may be on the verge of creating a mistake, so i ask.....i havet a big project we executed in 2008....i have kept it there and seem to need to continuously update it as a result of changes, requests for supplemental details, etc. Do i need to go ahead and at least updat it to 2009?......or, am i ok keeping it in 2008?

My theory is that it is best to start and finish a project in one version. I know this can be difficult since projects can go on forever. I just feel this is the safest way of doing business.
__________________
Greg Gebert

Dell Precision T3400
Windows XP x64
Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.4GHz
8GB Ram
NVIDIA Quadro FX1700 (512MB)
greg_gebert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-04-28, 02:55 PM   #8
clog boy
All AUGI, all the time
 
clog boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2006-12
Location: Probably near a PC.
Posts: 791
clog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moonclog boy is reaching for the moon
Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by greg_gebert View Post
My theory is that it is best to start and finish a project in one version. I know this can be difficult since projects can go on forever. I just feel this is the safest way of doing business.
Absolutely, unless a new version has new features that would be of great value to the project. And then still with great caution.
__________________
The Internet: slowly destroying intellect, one “zomg first!!!111!!1!” at a time.

- Storblington
clog boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-04-28, 04:45 PM   #9
dpasa
All AUGI, all the time
 
dpasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2004-08
Location: Greece
Posts: 629
dpasa has a bright futuredpasa has a bright futuredpasa has a bright futuredpasa has a bright futuredpasa has a bright futuredpasa has a bright future
Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

Since many people talk about upgrade or not, I must say that you must go to 2010, because Ribbon UI is here to stay so you should start using it....also, Adesk is changing the cost of updating the products for those that don't want subscriptions... it is getting expensive...
Revit 2010 is not bad.... it is just far from what we wanted and expected... that's why most people, me included, complain... there are some issues with the Ribbon but generally it is a good start of Revit's future... Maybe in RAC2011 we see the new form tools improved and in family editor too...or maybe we get a really great and updated mental ray inside Revit... and all the import/export options of Rhino... and the new graphite tools of Max for freeform modeling or maybe Acad's new tools and mesh object....
OK!OK! I woke up!... no more water!
__________________
D.P.A.S.A. I prefer Revit not for what it is, but for what it can be one day...
dpasa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-04-28, 05:29 PM   #10
Phil Read
I could stop if I wanted to
 
Phil Read's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2003-05
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 392
Phil Read is a beam of lightPhil Read is a beam of lightPhil Read is a beam of lightPhil Read is a beam of lightPhil Read is a beam of lightPhil Read is a beam of lightPhil Read is a beam of lightPhil Read is a beam of lightPhil Read is a beam of lightPhil Read is a beam of lightPhil Read is a beam of light
Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by dpasa View Post
Since many people talk about upgrade or not, I must say that you must go to 2010, because Ribbon UI is here to stay so you should start using it.
While the ribbon is "here to stay", it is not "here to stay put." You should expect the ribbon to change significantly for the next few releases as it will evolve due to user feedback. So learning it now may actually provide diminished returns resulting from having to relearn many times over what you could have learned once. Additionally, the allowance of significant user customization of the ribbon will prove most disruptive from a support standpoint. We will likely lock down the ribbon - but allow customization of keyboard shortcuts.

For this reason, we will remain in 2009 for the foreseeable future (and have advised our consultants and contractors to do the same - which they have agreed to do). Once the UI juggling settles down we will then consider moving to a later release.

If there were a "Classic" option we could have moved forward with this release - as well as beta tested the ribbon and provided more extensive feedback. Unfortunately this was not the case.

-Phil
__________________
Better to fix what's broken than polish what isn't...
http://twitter.com/philread
http://architechure.blogspot.com/

Last edited by Phil Read : 2009-04-29 at 11:35 PM.
Phil Read is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Go Back   AUGI Forums > AUGI Technical (English) > AEC > Revit > Revit Architecture Support > Revit Architecture - General

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NavisWorks 2010 to 2009 (xml file) diesellam NavisWorks - General 2 2009-06-26 06:01 PM
Revit x64: Производительность Standst Русский - Revit 3 2009-04-28 10:52 AM
Running 2010 with 2009 Installed Matt_Drainage AutoCAD Civil 3D - General 8 2009-04-27 09:55 PM
Adding a material in ACA 2009/ 2010 darren.bourne ACA General 2 2009-04-20 01:55 PM
Running 2009 apps in 2010 pdavis Revit - API 2 2009-03-30 02:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:41 PM.