mmiles
2009-04-24, 05:21 PM
hi all.
have a colleague (Revit Newbie) who built a timber framed building using a combination of in-place families and generic model families to create the various framing components. for example: the purlins for this framing assembly are "in-place" families that were categorized as columns (architectural) and then copied dozens of times. for all intents and purposes, she is refering to these as "beams", and now would like to schedule them.
However, I do not see a schedule category for columns - only structural ones. So, how can we accomplish this? I have a hunch it is a multi-category type, but I still do not see how to add the columns families into my fields for selection. Nor do I see a way to list generic models (which are used extensively for a variety of Truss-like assemblies), which is desirable at least to be able to count them, and locate them by room. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. thanks.
NOTE: I cannot help but think I may be putting the cart before the horse on this problem, but on the other hand I have to admit my scheduling experience is limited, and spotty at best.
have a colleague (Revit Newbie) who built a timber framed building using a combination of in-place families and generic model families to create the various framing components. for example: the purlins for this framing assembly are "in-place" families that were categorized as columns (architectural) and then copied dozens of times. for all intents and purposes, she is refering to these as "beams", and now would like to schedule them.
However, I do not see a schedule category for columns - only structural ones. So, how can we accomplish this? I have a hunch it is a multi-category type, but I still do not see how to add the columns families into my fields for selection. Nor do I see a way to list generic models (which are used extensively for a variety of Truss-like assemblies), which is desirable at least to be able to count them, and locate them by room. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. thanks.
NOTE: I cannot help but think I may be putting the cart before the horse on this problem, but on the other hand I have to admit my scheduling experience is limited, and spotty at best.