soender
2010-01-04, 02:25 PM
I have for for too long, thought about this..
As of now we have a workflow, where Arch creates initial geometry - ie. walls + doors and the bearing walls are then copied into a rvt Structure project. Now.. we have to keep a dummy wall in the Arch file to host the door and this has to be manually updated when bearing wall in linked project changes. Is it possible to optimise on this apparent QA error?
Copy/monitor is a PITA - so would like to avoid this.
Has anybody tried to workaround having two walls in the same place, by doing Arch doors as either floorbased, workplanebased or facebased (I have tried this, but is missing the "opening" in have to reside to using voids to cut the host wall - this void don't copy into the Struc. project)?
(and have done so with succes, on a large < 40.000m2 project)
As of now we have a workflow, where Arch creates initial geometry - ie. walls + doors and the bearing walls are then copied into a rvt Structure project. Now.. we have to keep a dummy wall in the Arch file to host the door and this has to be manually updated when bearing wall in linked project changes. Is it possible to optimise on this apparent QA error?
Copy/monitor is a PITA - so would like to avoid this.
Has anybody tried to workaround having two walls in the same place, by doing Arch doors as either floorbased, workplanebased or facebased (I have tried this, but is missing the "opening" in have to reside to using voids to cut the host wall - this void don't copy into the Struc. project)?
(and have done so with succes, on a large < 40.000m2 project)