Wrongway
2017-11-17, 06:38 PM
It seems like it would be a good idea to create, and constrain, reference planes as a basis for building layout.
And then align model elements to the reference planes.
And dimension to the (constrained) reference planes.
In the past, I have often just drawn walls and then used those as the references for other model elements.
As an observation, I recall that I always use floor 'levels' for vertical reference. I never just draw a floor and then reference beam, footing, roof or other floor elevations to a model element. I guess it has to do with point of view (plan view, typically), where one just starts drawing walls and doesn't always take time to create vertical reference planes, (and the fact that the Revit model creation input is in terms of floor levels too).
Does anybody dimension to reference planes rather than model elements?
Thanks,
D
And then align model elements to the reference planes.
And dimension to the (constrained) reference planes.
In the past, I have often just drawn walls and then used those as the references for other model elements.
As an observation, I recall that I always use floor 'levels' for vertical reference. I never just draw a floor and then reference beam, footing, roof or other floor elevations to a model element. I guess it has to do with point of view (plan view, typically), where one just starts drawing walls and doesn't always take time to create vertical reference planes, (and the fact that the Revit model creation input is in terms of floor levels too).
Does anybody dimension to reference planes rather than model elements?
Thanks,
D