jas
2005-06-23, 02:17 PM
Has anyone actually researched if they are saving file space by creating really complicated Dynamic Block files versus having multiple generic blocks?
For example, AutoCAD provides some sample dynamic blocks on the stock tool palette...and I was looking specifically at the weld symbol block. If you open that block in the block editor, you will realize that all of those weld symbols are just drawn on top of each other and they are controlled with a Visibility parameter. I had to wonder then if it really made sense to go through the trouble of creating that block and it's parameters, or if it would just be easier to stick with a weld palette that contains each symbol individually. Furthermore, and more to the point, does a more complicated dynamic block bulk up the file size versus 10 simple blocks on a palette?
What do you all think?
For example, AutoCAD provides some sample dynamic blocks on the stock tool palette...and I was looking specifically at the weld symbol block. If you open that block in the block editor, you will realize that all of those weld symbols are just drawn on top of each other and they are controlled with a Visibility parameter. I had to wonder then if it really made sense to go through the trouble of creating that block and it's parameters, or if it would just be easier to stick with a weld palette that contains each symbol individually. Furthermore, and more to the point, does a more complicated dynamic block bulk up the file size versus 10 simple blocks on a palette?
What do you all think?