double-click option

[ron_dibling]

Hello,
I recently joined a new company where I use AutoCAD 2000, prior to this I used Lt. I design electrical schematics. My problem is when I would like to modify the contents of a block I used to double-click the block to edit it, now I have to type ae? Is there a setting that I am missing?
Thank you

[Mike.Perry]

Hi

Please note I have *moved* this thread from the AutoCAD Customization (http://forums.augi.com/forumdisplay.php?f=118) forum to this one as I feel this particular Forum is a more appropriate place for such a topic.

Thanks, Mike

Forum Moderator

[Mike.Perry]

Hi

Take a look at the following thread...

Properties Tool bar Disabled? (http://forums.augi.com/showthread.php?t=27997)

I am not sure if AutoCAD 2000 supported Double Click Editing ( I have a feeling that particular functionality arrived with AutoCAD 2000i ).

What command is run when you use "AE" ?

Have a good one, Mike

[ron_dibling]

It is a ddatte command.

[Mike.Perry]

It is a ddatte command.Hi

Ok! you are working with Attributes.

Like I said above, I don't think Double Click Editing is available in AutoCAD 2000 ( hopefully someone with AutoCAD 2000 can confirm this, one-way or the other ).

Have a good one, Mike

[Opie]

Hi

Ok! you are working with Attributes.

Like I said above, I don't think Double Click Editing is available in AutoCAD 2000 ( hopefully someone with AutoCAD 2000 can confirm this, one-way or the other ).

Have a good one, Mike
When I used 2000, I did not have the ability to double-click to edit text. I think this came in 2002.

[ron_dibling]

Ok. Thanks for the help.

[Mike.Perry]

When I used 2000, I did not have the ability to double-click to edit text. I think this came in 2002.Hi

AutoCAD 2000i (http://betaprograms.autodesk.com/history/autocad_2000i_history.htm) ( history ).

Have a good one, Mike

[Opie]

Hi

AutoCAD 2000i (http://betaprograms.autodesk.com/history/autocad_2000i_history.htm) ( history ).

Have a good one, Mike
I figured that it was in 2000i, but I never used it so I wasn't certain. ;) Thanks for the update, Mike.