ron.sanpedro
2007-08-07, 05:27 PM
Does anyone have an Office Best Practice on naming of Detail Views?
Currently we have nothing specific, and about half our projects tend to leave all details just named Detail1, etc.
My thought was to name the detail in shorthand based on location and type. Thus:
Plan - Ext Wall - NW Corner
Then use Name on Sheet for something more appropriate for the CD set.
The idea is that temporary working details could then remain Detail37 (or better yet rename it with your initials like "GP Detail 1" if it has a lifespan beyond the next STC) and all the "working" details would sort nicely. Also you could tell by name where the detail is, making navigation by Project Browser a little easier.
Anyway, anyone else going down this road, or do you just leave all the details with meaningless names? and depend on hotlinks in views to get to the details?
Thanks,
Gordon
Currently we have nothing specific, and about half our projects tend to leave all details just named Detail1, etc.
My thought was to name the detail in shorthand based on location and type. Thus:
Plan - Ext Wall - NW Corner
Then use Name on Sheet for something more appropriate for the CD set.
The idea is that temporary working details could then remain Detail37 (or better yet rename it with your initials like "GP Detail 1" if it has a lifespan beyond the next STC) and all the "working" details would sort nicely. Also you could tell by name where the detail is, making navigation by Project Browser a little easier.
Anyway, anyone else going down this road, or do you just leave all the details with meaningless names? and depend on hotlinks in views to get to the details?
Thanks,
Gordon