pfaudler
2008-02-04, 03:13 PM
Hi,
We have developed our revit architectural models considering groundfloor as 0 level. But i just found out that Structural models are having sea level heights in their models. Therefore, when it comes to 3D co-ordination, these two models do not sit on right location.
From what i understnad, If need be one could relocate revit project in elevation and move it to the sea level height in shared co-ordinate system. Then When you go back to Level>Type properties, and change it to project elevation, it changes back to relative levels.
I have 14 arch. models to change sea level heights and i just want to get right advice before i start changing them to make sure taht i am not screwing up the models.
Just a question, Is it necessary to assign sea level height to floor levels in Revit Archi. models? any pros and cons, please?
Thanks in anticipation of your help.
Regards
We have developed our revit architectural models considering groundfloor as 0 level. But i just found out that Structural models are having sea level heights in their models. Therefore, when it comes to 3D co-ordination, these two models do not sit on right location.
From what i understnad, If need be one could relocate revit project in elevation and move it to the sea level height in shared co-ordinate system. Then When you go back to Level>Type properties, and change it to project elevation, it changes back to relative levels.
I have 14 arch. models to change sea level heights and i just want to get right advice before i start changing them to make sure taht i am not screwing up the models.
Just a question, Is it necessary to assign sea level height to floor levels in Revit Archi. models? any pros and cons, please?
Thanks in anticipation of your help.
Regards