Any 2015 DSVIEWER (Aerial View) users out there?
I do know that it has been "discontinued" for a while now, but those of you that make use of it are you seeing any graphics? My install simply displays an all white window of nothing. Wondering if it has to do with the graphics card and driver - Nvidia Quadro K4000
Re: Any 2015 DSVIEWER (Aerial View) users out there?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
duhvinci
I do know that it has been "discontinued" for a while now, but those of you that make use of it are you seeing any graphics? My install simply displays an all white window of nothing. Wondering if it has to do with the graphics card and driver - Nvidia Quadro K4000
I haven't tried it in 2015 yet, and still on 2014 here. If you don't get any other replies, ping me tonight on one of the social networks to remind me, I should be on my pc at home and can check it there.
Re: Any 2015 DSVIEWER (Aerial View) users out there?
Give the man a free workstation and free software and he wants it to work! :banghead:
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Any 2015 DSVIEWER (Aerial View) users out there?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
duhvinci
I do know that it has been "discontinued" for a while now, but those of you that make use of it are you seeing any graphics? My install simply displays an all white window of nothing. Wondering if it has to do with the graphics card and driver - Nvidia Quadro K4000
I get a grey window of nothing...
Nvidia GeForce
Attachment 95732
Re: Any 2015 DSVIEWER (Aerial View) users out there?
2014: Seems to work as designed.
2015: I can't see the viewport contents in the DSVIEWER window, but other than that the pan and zoom functions work OK.
Re: Any 2015 DSVIEWER (Aerial View) users out there?
Thanks for the feedback.
Murph: Something (or someone) has got to work around here.
Your Dorkness: I would have pinged you but I was having a successful golf outing - meaning I finished 18 holes with the same ball I started with. That's all I'm saying about that.
RK: I did notice the pan and zoom works. Not seeing the graphics however renders it somewhat useless. I don't anticipate a fix since it is a no longer supported feature.
Thanks again.