See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 56

Thread: 2009 vs. 2010

  1. #1
    100 Club
    Join Date
    2007-09
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    188
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default 2009 vs. 2010

    Does anyone know where I can find a document that explains what was changed between 2009 and 2010? I hope it wasn't just the interface?

  2. #2
    All AUGI, all the time clog boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    2006-12
    Location
    Probably near a PC.
    Posts
    842
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by greg_gebert View Post
    Does anyone know where I can find a document that explains what was changed between 2009 and 2010? I hope it wasn't just the interface?
    This page features known issues and feature summaries. Courtesy Revit.com (Autodesk's shortcut to their revit page)

  3. #3
    All AUGI, all the time dpasa's Avatar
    Join Date
    2004-08
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    637
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

    Mainly it was the interface and the new curtain wall panels.... Some small nice features but nothing much... and of course, nothing from the users wishlist.

  4. #4
    100 Club
    Join Date
    2007-09
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    188
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by dpasa View Post
    Mainly it was the interface and the new curtain wall panels.... Some small nice features but nothing much... and of course, nothing from the users wishlist.
    PERFECT! Thanks.

  5. #5
    I could stop if I wanted to
    Join Date
    2006-04
    Posts
    418
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

    i was reading a few posts over the last few days.....have seen a few where 2010 seems to strike users as problematic ( is it big deal or should we just jump on in?).....we're a little slow here advancing to the more recent release.....concerning that issue (our slowness) i may be on the verge of creating a mistake, so i ask.....i havet a big project we executed in 2008....i have kept it there and seem to need to continuously update it as a result of changes, requests for supplemental details, etc. Do i need to go ahead and at least updat it to 2009?......or, am i ok keeping it in 2008?

  6. #6
    I could stop if I wanted to
    Join Date
    2004-10
    Location
    Yorkshire, UK
    Posts
    402
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

    There is no technical problem keeping it on 2008. There may be licensing issues if you are not on subscription that you may have to clarify with your reseller.

  7. #7
    100 Club
    Join Date
    2007-09
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    188
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by ntnik View Post
    i was reading a few posts over the last few days.....have seen a few where 2010 seems to strike users as problematic ( is it big deal or should we just jump on in?).....we're a little slow here advancing to the more recent release.....concerning that issue (our slowness) i may be on the verge of creating a mistake, so i ask.....i havet a big project we executed in 2008....i have kept it there and seem to need to continuously update it as a result of changes, requests for supplemental details, etc. Do i need to go ahead and at least updat it to 2009?......or, am i ok keeping it in 2008?

    My theory is that it is best to start and finish a project in one version. I know this can be difficult since projects can go on forever. I just feel this is the safest way of doing business.

  8. #8
    All AUGI, all the time clog boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    2006-12
    Location
    Probably near a PC.
    Posts
    842
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by greg_gebert View Post
    My theory is that it is best to start and finish a project in one version. I know this can be difficult since projects can go on forever. I just feel this is the safest way of doing business.
    Absolutely, unless a new version has new features that would be of great value to the project. And then still with great caution.

  9. #9
    All AUGI, all the time dpasa's Avatar
    Join Date
    2004-08
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    637
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

    Since many people talk about upgrade or not, I must say that you must go to 2010, because Ribbon UI is here to stay so you should start using it....also, Adesk is changing the cost of updating the products for those that don't want subscriptions... it is getting expensive...
    Revit 2010 is not bad.... it is just far from what we wanted and expected... that's why most people, me included, complain... there are some issues with the Ribbon but generally it is a good start of Revit's future... Maybe in RAC2011 we see the new form tools improved and in family editor too...or maybe we get a really great and updated mental ray inside Revit... and all the import/export options of Rhino... and the new graphite tools of Max for freeform modeling or maybe Acad's new tools and mesh object....
    OK!OK! I woke up!... no more water!

  10. #10
    I could stop if I wanted to Phil Read's Avatar
    Join Date
    2003-05
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    398
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: 2009 vs. 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by dpasa View Post
    Since many people talk about upgrade or not, I must say that you must go to 2010, because Ribbon UI is here to stay so you should start using it.
    While the ribbon is "here to stay", it is not "here to stay put." You should expect the ribbon to change significantly for the next few releases as it will evolve due to user feedback. So learning it now may actually provide diminished returns resulting from having to relearn many times over what you could have learned once. Additionally, the allowance of significant user customization of the ribbon will prove most disruptive from a support standpoint. We will likely lock down the ribbon - but allow customization of keyboard shortcuts.

    For this reason, we will remain in 2009 for the foreseeable future (and have advised our consultants and contractors to do the same - which they have agreed to do). Once the UI juggling settles down we will then consider moving to a later release.

    If there were a "Classic" option we could have moved forward with this release - as well as beta tested the ribbon and provided more extensive feedback. Unfortunately this was not the case.

    -Phil
    Last edited by Phil Read; 2009-04-29 at 10:35 PM.

Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Can't uninstall 2009 or 2010
    By patricks in forum Revit Architecture - General
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2010-05-10, 07:54 PM
  2. communication between Max 2009 and 2010
    By stan.ciesielski in forum 3ds Max - General
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2009-11-19, 06:29 PM
  3. C3D 2009 ó C3D 2010
    By geocad in forum AutoCAD Civil 3D - General
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2009-10-22, 04:39 PM
  4. 2009 to 2010
    By wags5116 in forum Revit MEP - General
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2009-09-08, 10:06 PM
  5. RAC 2010 and 2009
    By michael.montagne in forum Revit Architecture - General
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2009-05-27, 10:25 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •