|
Do you mean, one line is in the same horizontal space as another line? Not typically.
When you specify the hierarchy of the styles for the site, this hierarchy will control the visual styles for the common parcel lines between differently styled parcels. In my prior explanation, we are required to have the perimeter of our subdivision a thick line (1.0 mm for talking purposes). All parcels that are connected to the perimeter of the subdivision will have their common lines with the perimeter to be thick. We then have our right-of-way lines not as thick as the perimeter (0.5 mm). It is also a different linetype. Anywhere the right-of-way line is located will have the 0.5 mm plotted thickness, unless it is common to the subdivision perimeter and then the subdivision perimeter controls the style. Now, when we move to the individual lot lines, they are a much thinner lineweight (0.35 mm). Of course, when they are common to the right-of-way or subdivision perimeter, those styles will control the look.
Does that make sense, or did I start rambling on again?
If you have a technical question, please find the appropriate forum and ask it there.
You will get a quicker response from your fellow AUGI members than if you sent it to me via a PM or email.
jUSt
I see what you are saying..... And I realize my issue, if I am understanding you correctly. My issue isn't with my parcels, its with my Site.
You create a Site based on your outbound. Then you create separate parcels under that site for your right-of-way, easements, individual lots etc.,. Than depending on the hierarchy of the site it will display the line types correctly because all of these objects are linked to that one site.
I take it that the hierarchy approach doesn't work when you create each lot as an individual Site then?
That is correct since they do not interact. They must be in the same site for my workflow to work.
I have thought about doing a separate site to show utility servitudes. This would allow me to style them quickly. Since I do not typically draw our plats or surveys, this approach to servitudes has not been fully developed.
If you have a technical question, please find the appropriate forum and ask it there.
You will get a quicker response from your fellow AUGI members than if you sent it to me via a PM or email.
jUSt
"How we think determines what we do, and what we do determines what we get."
Sincpac C3D ~ Autodesk Exchange Apps
Computer Specs:
Dell Precision 3660, Core i9-12900K 5.2GHz, 64GB DDR5 RAM, PCIe 4.0 M.2 SSD (RAID 0), 16GB NVIDIA RTX A4000
Thanks Blackbox. 2 interesting points. 1. I was trained by the survey department on how to create parcels. They got training 2 years ago (prior to my arrival) but afterwards continued using Eagle point software. When I joined I asked how they do parcels and got a bunch of scribbled notes and a brief lesson on how they remembered it was done.
The second point is that I'm the one responsible for training and implementing standards. Now you can understand why I feel like a dummy.
"How we think determines what we do, and what we do determines what we get."
Sincpac C3D ~ Autodesk Exchange Apps
Computer Specs:
Dell Precision 3660, Core i9-12900K 5.2GHz, 64GB DDR5 RAM, PCIe 4.0 M.2 SSD (RAID 0), 16GB NVIDIA RTX A4000
Property lines are drawn on layers 'overall boundary', 'row', 'lots', and 'centerline' (lines & arcs)
Parcels are created using this linework, and original linework is retained.
Parcel style = [Parcel Segments on layer C-PROP-BNDY] - layer should be visible in the style so that you can select the parcel to label it.
But then turn off the visibility in the style and leave the layer itself on and thawed in the layer manager.
Prospector > Drawing > Sites > SiteName > Right Click on Parcels > Composition Tab > Parcel style display order
If there are more than one listed, make sure the desired style is at the top of the list.
I think I covered it all --- and doing it this way allows for the parcel labels to remain visible even though the parcel object itself is not visible.
Last edited by BlackBox; 2014-04-02 at 05:15 PM. Reason: Removed duplicate quote.
R.K. McSwain | CAD Panacea |