Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Pad Footing elevation at bottom is wrong

  1. #1
    I could stop if I wanted to
    Join Date
    2008-05
    Posts
    443
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Pad Footing elevation at bottom is wrong

    I have pad footings that are scheduling the incorrect elevation at bottom.

    It's out by 7/8".
    The pad footings show at the underside of the slab where they should be.
    If I dimension from the reference level, (top of foundation and project base point 0.0) I get a different dimension than is scheduled. BIG problem.

    I've been reading that this is somehow changed when the footings attach to a column or grade beam. Any solution?

  2. #2
    Super Moderator david_peterson's Avatar
    Join Date
    2002-09
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    5,687
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Pad Footing elevation at bottom is wrong

    Only way I know of it changing is if it's set to project coords or sharded coords.
    Did you check the elevation of both the project base point and the survey point?
    The elevation would change if it's connected to a column (not sure on grade beams) but only if the base elevation of the column changed.

  3. #3
    All AUGI, all the time
    Join Date
    2008-11
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    754
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Pad Footing elevation at bottom is wrong

    It is true that pad footings being connected to columns will push down as the column does.

    I typically model my columns up to 35mm short of the pad footing. This leaves room to detail or model in a grout pad, + base plate and keeps the column from being "attached" to the pad footing.
    This poses problems only if you are using the analytical model for analysis.

    I do not attach walls or columns to footings, because it will cause this problem. Another way to stop it is to model your footing to a reference plane, and lock the face of the footing using the align tool (then click the lock symbol) to the reference plane, and lock your reference plane with a dimension to a fixed level (dimension to a level and again click the lock button when the dimension is placed, or selected). Test this out, but I am 99% sure the locked ref plane will work for you.
    I should mention also to ensure that your "fixed" levels are locked, or Revit will prioritise the level being locked to the reference plane, and should this somehow get pushed down (or up) without you realising, would change the RL of your "fixed" level.

    Of course, if you've modelled all of your footings alread then this is not going to help.
    Short answer is yes, columns will push your footings down and revit will NOT warn you about it, so its something to be aware of.
    Last edited by Craig_L; 2014-04-08 at 08:05 AM.

  4. #4
    Super Moderator david_peterson's Avatar
    Join Date
    2002-09
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    5,687
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Pad Footing elevation at bottom is wrong

    Funny, if the column is attached to the footing I always get a warning.
    Instead of leaving a gap we created a column that is the base plate, grout and anchor rods. Work great for us.
    The ref plane is the other way to do it. I've never experience a footing moving on it's own. Again if the footing is attached to the column, when the bottom of column elevation changes, the footing changes as it one should expect.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  5. #5
    All AUGI, all the time
    Join Date
    2008-11
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    754
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Pad Footing elevation at bottom is wrong

    Yes, I had forgotten about that warning...
    However wall strip footings, will not warn you if your wall depth changes.

  6. #6
    I could stop if I wanted to
    Join Date
    2008-05
    Posts
    443
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Pad Footing elevation at bottom is wrong

    My columns show in the right place, dimension correctly, but the underside of footing field is incorrect. I thought it was project base point related, but I've adjusted those with no change to the underside of footing property. I think its called "elevation at bottom".

    Is it possible that this field holds a value from when the footing was created? I've changed the level that they're associated with, changed my project base, and survey point, both by moving them and typing the correct number in the elevation field. Even new footings show the same problem.

    Is it possible that they're reading to Revit's inaccessible "actual" coordinate system that I've heard about. I'm 22mm off and when I first checked the project base point, that's how far it was off the TOF. I moved it and re-entered the elevation, and re positioned the survey point. I've probably done this wrong somehow.

Similar Threads

  1. Bottom of Footing?
    By m_cahoon14336 in forum Revit Architecture - General
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2012-01-26, 11:58 PM
  2. Elevation Symbol Reporting Wrong Elevation In Wrong Format....
    By aaronrumple in forum Revit - Platform
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2009-10-16, 02:23 PM
  3. attach footing to bottom of linked column
    By Bryan Thatcher in forum Revit Structure - General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2009-09-23, 01:04 AM
  4. Bottom of footing elevation
    By Tom Weir in forum Revit Structure - General
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 2008-09-18, 09:39 PM
  5. Bug: Bottom of Footing Elevation
    By Steve Mintz in forum Revit Structure - General
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2006-05-25, 07:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •