Anyone who walks out of an interview after being asked to take a test can feel free to do so, but I would never consider them for a position. While the interviewee thinks they are too good to be tested, or insulted by the suggestion, what evidence does the interviewer have to measure the competence level of the interviewee? Sounds like this person is not welcome to scrutiny.Originally Posted by Wanderer
I have been testing for nearly a decade, and have been using the same test for all. It is a relatively simple drawing, with questions afterward, that require the ability to draw accurately so the correct answers are found. In giving this test about 30 times, I've had people who aced it in 15 minutes, and users who took 40 minutes to draw a few lines and nothing more. I'm sure you can guess which of these were hired, and which were not.
What if the test were not a CAD test, but a drug test, would everyone still be willing to participate?