Am I missing something or are tables not annotative?

[roelie]

Am I missing something or are tables not annotative?

[Mike.Perry]

Hi

Nope! you are not missing anything (as far as I am aware).

Mike

[Augi Doggie]

Am I missing something or are tables not annotative?

The list includes text, mtext, dimensions, leaders, multi-leaders, blocks, attributes, and hatches. Sorry, not tables.

[CADDmanVA]

The list includes text, mtext, dimensions, leaders, multi-leaders, blocks, attributes, and hatches. Sorry, not tables.

Ah! But considering that a table can include text, mtext, blocks, attributes, and blocks with hatches in them, aren't they annotative by associative default?

[Augi Doggie]

Ah! But considering that a table can include text, mtext, blocks, attributes, and blocks with hatches in them, aren't they annotative by associative default?

That's a good thought and I honestly haven't tried it yet, but even if the text was annotative, the table linework probably would not be able to "scale itself up" to match it.

I'll look in to it and post back when I find out more.

[lbernacchi]

I just tested a basic table that contained text assigned to an annotative style. Unfortunately you have to be in the mtext editor so you don't have to option to choose annotative scales. When I made a viewport and changed the annotative scale away from the current, nothing happened. It appears that, eventhough the entities within it are annotative, tables take the annotativeness away.