See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Only one wall offset option - is this correct?

  1. #1
    All AUGI, all the time
    Join Date
    2002-12
    Posts
    695
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Only one wall offset option - is this correct?

    I am accustomed to having the option of offsetting walls from core face to core face (id or od) seems like Revit only allows you to offset center of wall to center of wall. Is this correct or am I missing something?

    Thanks

    Dick Barath

  2. #2
    Super Moderator beegee's Avatar
    Join Date
    2003-05
    Location
    crusing 11 kms above Australia
    Posts
    5,153
    Login to Give a bone
    1

    Default Re: Only one wall offset option - is this correct?

    It depends where the loc line of the wall is located. The offset works from loc line to loc line.

  3. #3
    All AUGI, all the time
    Join Date
    2002-12
    Posts
    695
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Only one wall offset option - is this correct?

    I meant to say - "without having to go to a d... dialogue box and change the setting." For how intelligent Revit is .... it is equally as dumb.

    Regards

    Dick Barath

  4. #4
    Revit Technical Specialist - Autodesk Scott D Davis's Avatar
    Join Date
    2003-04
    Location
    Chino, CA
    Posts
    4,756
    Login to Give a bone
    1

    Default Re: Only one wall offset option - is this correct?

    If you offset a wall 24" from centerline to centerline. Isn't that the same as 24" from outside face to outside face?

  5. #5
    All AUGI, all the time
    Join Date
    2002-12
    Posts
    695
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Only one wall offset option - is this correct?

    Scott:

    It certainly is - 24" is 24" no matter what.

    Please follow me - here it is in ADT. Start to layout a building - draw one exterior corner. Offset from outside of wall by positioning cursor and then offset opposite outside wall (i.e. 40'). Now pick the outside wall and draw office. Position cursor on inside face of outside wall and offset wall (wall style of your choice) to interior dimension (i.e. 12'). Basically the cursor allows you to choice which type of offset you want no messing with dialog boxes.

    Wish the ADT and Revit brains could get together (I realize the programs are totally different) and gleam out the gems that exists in both programs and come up with the better METHODOLOGIES.

    Regards

    Dick Barath

  6. #6
    Revit Mararishi aaronrumple's Avatar
    Join Date
    2002-02
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    4,695
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Only one wall offset option - is this correct?

    I think you'll find most Revit users just sketch without paying too much atention to getting the dimensions perfect. I know you do this in ADT because changing things later is too much of a pain. In Revit, I'll sketch, push things around a bit until I'm happy with the design. Then I'll run a string of dimensions and adjust the building using the dimension strings. I find this much faster than trying to get everything right on first placement and better mimics the iterative process of design.

  7. #7
    AUGI Addict hand471037's Avatar
    Join Date
    2003-05
    Location
    Oakland, California
    Posts
    1,934
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Only one wall offset option - is this correct?

    I'll second that. It's much faster in Revit to work sloppy and then make things accurate, which is the total oppisite from Acad/ADT.

    For example, when I do as-builts for a house, I'll take my laptop, walk the house, and make a rough sketch of the whole plan. Then I'll add face to face dim strings into every room, then make a second 'loop' through the house measuring, entering in the distance to the proper dim string, and then locking that dim string. The house 'organically' grows outward/inward, until I've got my as-built. And it takes way less time, to, then how I used to do it in AutoCAD.

    Also, when I would teach Revit, it was the same. All the people will lots of AutoCAD/ADT experance were taking great pains to draw everything right the first time, because it's such pain to change anything in AutoCAD/ADT sometimes, and the system as a whole isn't helping you in any way to maintain some level of precision. Once they let go of that, they found that they could work just as accurately and much faster by working in Revit's 'way'.

    In Revit, lines/walls heal, you can directly enter the distances like AuoCAD/ADT when drawing, you can effortlessly change dimesnsions after something's been drawn, and the snapping distance changes on the fly depending on your zoom- so it's easy to 'trust' the system, even when working sloppy and then making it right.

    So, instead of trying hard to draw the wall perfectly the first time, simply draw the wall where it's going to be, and then click on it and alter the dims to put it exactly where you want it, and you'll find, I think, it to be consiterably faster and just as accurate.

  8. #8
    All AUGI, all the time BillyGrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    2004-04
    Location
    in a calm assertive state
    Posts
    638
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Only one wall offset option - is this correct?

    I'll third that, and if you want precision from the outset, I've even used gridlines to layout
    my major rectilinears, then run my walls in/out on those, and lock them to the grids...
    Revisions at that point mean running dim's to gridlines, highlighting the gridline, and entering desired value. It's all so much better, but remember what as Scott's sig say's, "you must unlearn..."

    The cool thing is, even though you can design and then refine in a much looser fashion at the outset, you end up with a much more precise model in the end, as "fudging" is not allowed:

    "draw it like you build it"

    cheers

  9. #9
    Revit Technical Specialist - Autodesk Scott D Davis's Avatar
    Join Date
    2003-04
    Location
    Chino, CA
    Posts
    4,756
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Only one wall offset option - is this correct?

    but remember what as Scott's sig say's, "you must unlearn..."
    I've thought of changing it several times, but it just fits so well....I had Yoda as my avatar for awhile back in the Zoogdesign days....

  10. #10
    All AUGI, all the time BillyGrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    2004-04
    Location
    in a calm assertive state
    Posts
    638
    Login to Give a bone
    0

    Default Re: Only one wall offset option - is this correct?

    At a minimum, to all the newb's in Revit, it fit's

    I have heard that little phrase in my head time and again
    when bustin moves in the 3d scape.

    DICK!

    it gets easier...

    when you find (or write) a prog that meets all of your expectations, I'll line up first to buy it
    (but I think I already have)

Similar Threads

  1. Incremental Option in Offset
    By autocad.wishlist1734 in forum AutoCAD Wish List
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2012-12-23, 06:29 PM
  2. Correct offset alignment transitions
    By civil3d.wishlist1941 in forum Civil 3D Wish List
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2010-11-20, 01:03 PM
  3. Offset option in Sections
    By inventor.wishlist1738 in forum Inventor Wish List
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2009-02-08, 10:17 PM
  4. Add Offset Option to the Align Command
    By bclarch in forum Revit Architecture - Wish List
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2006-08-01, 08:27 PM
  5. Correct procedure for CAL option dpl(p,p1,p2)
    By yjayakumar in forum AutoCAD General
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2006-02-06, 01:40 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •