|
LOL . . .When they opened up the possibilty of having a million levels, they also allowed them to be named, the numbers only remain for legacy purposes.
My issue is there seems to be no follow through to make sure new features work with other things as they should. Bentley would've made sure it worked on the palettes and design center because it's obvious. . . as they did when they allowed a million levels to be created, it was obvious naming them should be the default vs. keeping them numbered and then allowing names in the next release. . . follow through
But I've moved away from it and I'm learning to accept Autocad again, I can't help but miss it.. . . until I get everyone using Revit!!!
Thanks again
Ha ha, you have a good point there. Autodesk has been known to pull a few stupid moves in the past. I cut my teeth on AutoCAD almost 10 years ago. When I had to use Microstation (V5 I think), it didn't mesh well with the experience I had up until then. To each there own though...ambiguity makes the world go `round![]()
Thanks again CADDManVA.
Hopefully there's a fix for this soon.
I am working on a workaround. Don't know if it will work just yet. I will let you know if anything works out.
Great thanks! I was looking through Autodesk Discussion groups, someone mentioned doing a VBA routine as a "band-aid" as the person put it, but didn't specify how. I haven't gotten into that yet, not sure if that's where you were headed. Here's the link http://discussion.autodesk.com/threa...sageID=5569418