Originally Posted by
bruno.vankogelenberg
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't both Mst and Autocad more a way to do things than a goal itself? I mean you don't have an Autocad team just to have it. Your team creates something, so I think it's quite possible to have a marveillous designer who is not good in Autocad or Mst. Mst or Autocad is in the company I work for "customer related" : we have clients who demand DWG's and others who demand DGN's.
Mst to Autocad, it's another way of thinking. Most of the Mst commands can, if they don't exist, be made through Autolisp. I think of e.g. rotate with copy), you can copy, you can rotate, but you'll be surprised to find out how much time you gain if you can copy something and rotate it in the same action. I've created in lisp the command CRT, and with four lines of lispcode, it combines both actions.