Originally Posted by
stanmpd
We aren't switching. We have a lot of properties that are in AutoCAD and there are some jobs that are quicker to do in CAD if the work is not too extensive. We do still work primarily in Revit for the larger projects, but when ACA shipped in our latest suite, it looked like it may be a good alternative to CAD. We will always use Revit and will always have a need for AutoCAD. We were looking at this to see if it was a viable alternative to AutoCAD since it seems very similar to Revit on the surface. From what I have seen so far, we will probably stick with the setup we have. I still haven't found a way to install ACA without it killing AutoCAD, even with putting it in a different directory. This makes it a little difficult to make a side-by-side comparison. I am still going to look at ACA and learn what I can about it, but unless it can work on our space planning projects in our existing drawings, then it will most likely stay in the box. It would have been nice to have CAD with a lot of the Revit features. Revit has spoiled me.